by: Emily Layfield - November 2024
I’m a person who has always been fascinated by figuring myself out, why I work the way I do and what other ways of being might be on the table. When I was a teenager I would buy magazines just for the quizzes, and in the early days of Buzzfeed I would always want to know which character in a book series I would be, or what my dream vacation was. We all have narratives about who we are and how we work and what kind of a person we are. A lot of those narratives might be tied to our identities - maybe our gender, or our culture, or even that we have a particular diagnosis or type of brain, or the kinds of experiences we’ve gone through. We’re social animals, and our brains love to categorize, and those kinds of narratives can not only help us feel connected to each other, but they can also give us ideas about how to move through the world - if something seems like it works for someone like me, maybe it will work for me too. If these seem to be the norms for my group, comparing myself to them will help me know if I’m on the right track for belonging.
In 1:1 coaching relationships, we get to spend the time deep diving into each idiosyncratic individual to hopefully better understand how these kinds of narratives and habits and experiences and strategies and assumptions manifest and intersect uniquely in each person, but there’s also something to be said for making use of the more general tools that give us mental frameworks for our identities or tendencies on larger scales - and especially if those tools are widely available, or come with fewer barriers to entry. Let’s take some time to explore some of the tools and assessments that I’ve found useful.
Before we get into the fun part, it’s important to keep in mind the common problems with popular assessments and why we need to take what we’re given with many grains of salt. In particular, assessments focused on figuring out what your ‘type’ is, with various numbers of available categories. These kinds of systems are extremely limited, since most human traits fall on a spectrum. For example, if you had a trait that was scored from 1 to 100 on a scale and people scoring under 50 were put in one bucket and above 50 in a different bucket, moving from 49 to 51 would give you a completely different result. But a person scoring 49 might have a lot more in common with a person scoring 51 than they would with someone scoring 5, even though a 5 and 49 fall into the same category. Most scientific research into personality allows for much more nuance, and assessments used by personality researchers generally rate people on a series of scales rather than assigning them categorical types. Many popular assessments, like the MBTI for example, also have reliability problems, where the same person taking the same test with only a few weeks between tests can end up with completely different results, which limits what conclusions you can draw. Not to mention that people can display different personality traits situationally.
That’s not to say it can’t be helpful to engage with less scientific kinds of assessments, but it’s important to look out for these kinds of issues and to limit using them as a basis for significant conclusions on their own. Often I find unscientific assessments or categorizations of people most useful as narrative frames to push my reflective thinking up against to see if new ideas and insights can emerge, but I wouldn’t want to use an assessment result to contribute to, say, a hiring decision, or internalize as part of my personal narrative that as a ______ type, I’m intrinsically bad at _______ skill or locked into _______ behavior. I’ve definitely gotten some new insights by engaging with systems like the Enneagram, or Gretchen Rubin’s Four Tendencies, and there are so many more, but for the most part I tend to recommend more open ended tools.
Here are the tools I recommend the most frequently to people looking for increased self knowledge and interpersonal insights.
The Big 5 (Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism) are the personality traits most commonly tested in personality research, and there are lots of studies out there correlating where people fall on these trait scales with different outcomes or behaviors. If you like to geek out about the science of personality, this can be an interesting tool. You can find these assessments in lots of different iterations, but I like this website, because it not only includes a free test but also a lot of interesting reading about personality research: https://personality-project.org/
This assessment gives a personalized ranking of their 24 ‘character strengths’, which can be a useful frame for thinking about aligning what we care about and our best personal qualities with things like where we spend our time or what our aspirations are. I appreciate that it is strengths focused, which also helps us to focus on where we shine rather than our perceived deficiencies. You can find that assessment here: https://www.viacharacter.org/
Another assessment I like, CliftonStrengths, is also strengths focused - but it is not available for free, and is also focused more on determining in what situations we perform at our best rather than our character strengths.
Coming up with a list of personal core values can be a helpful touchstone whenever we feel stuck or running up against a sense of inner unease about how we’re spending our time, or to what causes or relationships we’re contributing our energy. There are lots of lists out there of options, and a common exercise is to start by going through the whole list and circling any words that are resonant, then narrowing down to a top ten, then a top five. Here’s one list, and but there are many others.
One of the most impactful team building exercises I ever participated in involved us each placing ourselves on a series of spectrums of cultural norms - things like our relationship with time, or how much directness in communication was most comfortable to us. We then had discussions about how those preferences played out in our individual experiences and then how we could find norms as a team given where we were each individually coming from. Reflecting on each of these preferences and explicitly naming them as preferences rather than assuming that our own preferences are the default has remained very helpful when engaging in all kinds of relationships. The list I’ve used was based on Erin Meyer’s Culture Map. A free introductory quiz can be found embedded in this article - Another layer of helpful context can come in by engaging with this idea in the framework of white supremacy culture.
For those thinking about a career shift, I often hear people talking about what industry they would like to work in or what job they can imagine themselves holding, but one aspect that is often undervalued is thinking about the typical day to day tasks and whether those sets of tasks seem like they’d be a good fit for a person to spend their days doing. This assessment isn’t perfect, but often provides good food for thought along those lines. You can find it here: https://www.mynextmove.org/explore/ip
Do you have a tool or assessment you love that wasn’t mentioned here? Please let me know! Send me an email.